Mudan & Anor v Revenue and Customs Case

Dealing with property ownership and tax issues can be overwhelming, and a recent case involving the Mudans serves as a clear example of why seeking specialist advice is so important, particularly when it comes to Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) assessments.

In this case, the Mudans argued that their property, completed in August 2019, was not  suitable for residential use and therefore should qualify for non-residential SDLT rates. However, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) disagreed, ruling that a property that was previously used as a dwelling remains classified as residential, even if it isn’t immediately livable, unless its disrepair is so severe that it can no longer be considered suitable for residential use.

The Mudans had initially paid £177,000 in SDLT but later sought a refund of £99,750 after a consultant advised them they might be eligible for a lower rate. HMRC, however, disputed this claim, sparking a prolonged appeal process that highlighted the complexity of property classification under the Finance Act 2003.

In the end, the Upper Tribunal upheld the FTT’s decision, clarifying that suitability for residential use doesn't mean the property must be ready for immediate occupation. This case highlights the importance of professional advice when it comes to navigating tax regulations in property transactions.

While we are not tax advisors, at our firm, we understand the complexities of these matters and work closely with specialists who can provide the tailored guidance you need. Seeking expert advice can be crucial to ensuring that you make informed decisions and achieve favourable outcomes in your property dealings.

Please call us on 0116 212 1000, or complete our free Contact Us form and we will get in touch as soon as possible.

View all